The real agenda behind gay anti-bullying clubs in your school

by Peter Baklinski
LifeSiteNews.com

WALTHAM, Massachusetts September 6, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Back in the early 1990’s most people in North America would have doubted there would ever come a day when the homosexual agenda would be accepted with open arms in elementary and high schools. Today however, that agenda is firmly implanted in public schools and is quickly making its way into Catholic schools, thanks to a well-planned strategy laid out by radical gay activists in 1995.

In the early 90’s Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered (GLBT) activists in Massachusetts sought to indoctrinate school children with homosexual values. GLBT activist Kevin Jennings, who was later appointed by President Obama as the assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools inside the Department of Education, masterminded the scheme of gay anti-bullying programs as a perfect inroad into the otherwise resistant classrooms of the nation.

“If the Radical Right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose,” warned Jennings in a 1995 speech to fellow GLBT activists outlining his strategy. “Their language–‘promoting homosexuality’–is laced with subtle and not-so-subtle innuendo that we are ‘after their kids.’”

Jennings argued that the key to success lay in “framing” the issue in another way, to the advantage of the GLBT cause.

The strategy consists in linking the GLBT cause to “universal values” that everyone in the community has in common, such as “safety.” One then builds on this universal value the idea that “homophobia” represents a “threat” to students’ safety since it creates a “climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common.” From this point, one simply promotes legislation and programs for schools that frames the GLBT agenda in the language of these universal values.

“This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedalling from day one,” boasted Jennings. “[N]o one could speak up against our frame and say, ‘Why, yes, I do think students should kill themselves:’ This allowed us to set the terms for debate.”

Jennings realized that this strategy would effectively throw any opposition into a defensive mode and steal their best line of attack. If anyone objected to the homosexual and transgender indoctrination that the activists planned to push in the schools, they would be accused of heartless disregard for students.

Despite the fact that it has been executed time and time again for almost two decades the methods and talking points have hardly changed at all. A recent policy to address “homophobic harassment and bullying, and homophobia and heterosexism” approved by the Board of Education in Burnaby, BC followed Jennings’ strategy precisely, right down to the language of “safety.”

Policy # 5.45 states that to “ensure that all members of the school community work together in an atmosphere of respect and safety regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, the Board of Education will adopt appropriate administrative regulations and strategies that promote respect for human rights, support diversity, and address discrimination.”

The final goal of the campaign, according to Jennings, is that one day when, “straight people” hear that someone is “promoting homosexuality,” he would say “‘Yeah, who cares?’ because they wouldn’t necessarily equate homosexuality with something bad that you would not want to promote.”

While much of the past 15 years has left the goals of the gay ant-bullying scheme carefully unspoken, a recent article in an online homosexual publication let the cat out of the bag.

“Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?,” wrote Daniel Villarreal on Queerty.com, a website that promotes the gay agenda.

“We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are,” he added.

“I for one,” continued Villarreal, “certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f**ing men.”

For a fuller description please see the special report on Jennings by Mass Resistance.

Copyright 2011 LifeSiteNews.com

Related posts

6 Thoughts to “The real agenda behind gay anti-bullying clubs in your school”

  1. Lyndell

    Thanks for what you do to assist our society back to sanity.

  2. ni brob

    welcome to BC were most people are liberal and dont care about protecting society

  3. s.

    your platform is deeply misinformed and manipulative.

    1. @s.

      Actually, in response to our fully-informed FACTS, the Vancouver and Burnaby school boards as well as the people who run Out In Schools have been spending a lot of time this past week amending their material and policies in order to distance the pornographic links from our children. There’s no better proof of the accuracy of our accusations than that.

      1. STOP HATE

        There are ways to check that (i.e. look back at old versions of websites) – I just did and you are lying again. The site changed because they were getting support and donations for the program before. I think we can all agree that children should be protected from lewd imagery. Interesting that my comments are not being posted. ‘Concerned people’ should now see ALL 3 of my comments up here on this site – if this is indeed a ‘democratic’ two-way conversation. Otherwise, it’s just another form of cyber-bullying. Perhaps not everyone agrees with your points that you are broadcasting here. Wouldn’t you agree?

  4. Keith

    Kari simpson is spreading fear and hate. those views expressed by her are not only dangerous to young minds, it is completely without fact.

    If you think teens are not having sex or should obstain I have two words. Bristol Palin. How old were you Kari when you started having sex? I was 15 and did not have the tools to navigate dating and protect myself against STD’s.

    Kari Simpson and her views are the reason as an 11 year old boy, I tried to walk off the top of a building and later tried to jump from a balcony. Kari and her followers hate such as us being embarassment to our families, to being an abomination in the eyes of God, to our being harassed and killed as justifiable.

    Kari, when you know better, you do better. I hope you are not endangering any more lives of our vulnerable youth. They need proper information and you are just plain dangerous and what you are doing is nothing short of hate crime and you are preying on young children who are vulnerable. We are born gay, not made gay. You seem to believe it is a choice, so tell us, when did you sit down and say to yourself, “I don’t want to have these lesbian feelings anymore.”

Comments are closed.